Let systems handle routine work. Let people make the decisions.
Your ERP, email, documents and other systems contain the information your company needs. AI agents and automation can connect that information, complete approved repeatable tasks and send exceptions to the people responsible. We design each solution around your process, systems, access rules and business goals. This is not a universal product you can switch on without implementation.
Your existing systems stay at the center.
An agent may read a request, retrieve supporting information, prepare a record, check conditions and propose the next action. Standard automation can then complete clearly defined steps. A person approves sensitive decisions and handles unclear cases.
Choose an industry to explore how these parts could work together. Select an agent, process owner or connected system to see its role.
Anonymized client engagement. Two functions are in use; seven are in development. The animated walkthrough is illustrative, not a recording of live operations.
Illustrative design only. No agents in this map are presented as deployed.
Illustrative design only. No agents in this map are presented as deployed.
9 agent functions · 2 in use · 7 in development · 6 responsible roles · 8 connected or potential data sources
8 potential functions · 5 business roles · 6 systems
8 potential functions · 5 business roles · 6 systems
Walkthrough example
From sales inquiry to the information needed for period-end closing
From transport request to an invoice ready for approval
From incoming invoice to a management overview
step where a person decides
Illustrative example — no client data. The animated walkthrough is illustrative, not a recording of live operations. Two functions are in use; seven are in development.
Illustrative design only. No agents in this map are presented as deployed.
Illustrative design only. No agents in this map are presented as deployed.
All agents (9)
Agents
Your owners and approvers
All agents (8)
Agents
Your owners and approvers
All agents (8)
Agents
Your owners and approvers
Legend and detail
- Existing system / data source · the ERP, email and documents you already have
- AI agent / automated function · one area of work, one owner
- In use · this specific function is already operating in the described client engagement
- In development · this specific function is planned or being built, but is not yet operating
- Illustrative design · a potential configuration, shown to explain a process; not a deployed system
- Highlighted agent · where the selected agent hands over its result
- Responsible person · the role that owns the function and gives human approval where required
Where this approach makes sense
It works best when a repeated process crosses several employees or systems, has clear business ownership and uses data that can be accessed reliably.
It is usually not worth building a complex agent for a one-off task or a process with no clear owner.
Have a process like this? Let's discuss it in a 30-minute call.
Follow one case from start to finish.
Illustrative example. No client data. This is not a live product demo. Example: monthly contract invoicing — from hours worked to payment matching.
Monthly contract invoicing
Illustrative example — no client dataWhat the system handles: Reads recorded work hours and matches them to the contract.
Where a person steps in: Adds or corrects missing details.
What the system handles: Flags inconsistencies and prepares them for review.
Where a person steps in: Confirms or corrects the findings.
What the system handles: Prepares invoice details and supporting documents.
Where a person steps in: Reviews extra work and approves the proposed invoice.
What the system handles: Performs permitted ERP updates and follow-up steps.
Where a person steps in: Handles any case outside the agreed rules.
What the system handles: Matches payment information with the invoice and records the result.
Where a person steps in: Resolves mismatches that prevent closure.
Every important action has a recorded status and a named owner. Actual traceability depends on the agreed implementation.
Illustrative example — no client data- 01systemWork hours matched to the contract.
- 01personDetails added.
- 02systemInconsistencies flagged for review.
- 02personFindings reviewed.
- 03systemInvoice details prepared.
- 03personInvoice draft approved.
- 04systemPermitted ERP updates completed.
- 04personException resolved.
- 05systemPayment matched, result recorded.
- 05personMismatch resolved, case closed.
You keep your ERP. We build on Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and other systems. We introduce changes in stages, with agreed testing and a handover into operation — it needs data preparation, access and time from your IT.
What an agent is allowed to do
For each function, the permitted level is agreed in advance.
What an agent is allowed to do
1. Monitor Read information, check conditions and flag a problem. Example: Detect an order that may miss its deadline.
Incoming invoice
- Invoice checkSystem does it
- ProposalDone by a person
- Recording the outcomeDone by a person
- Next stepDone by a person
- Sending the paymentAlways approved by a person
At every level, an unclear situation goes to a person.
Important: Sending payments or taking similarly sensitive actions remains subject to explicit human authorization in the proposed process.
A clear view of the work and the decisions waiting for you.
Management dashboard — illustrative example, no client data.
Risk estimates show assumptions, not guarantees.
This is an estimate to support a decision. It does not authorize the system to act.
Management dashboard Illustrative example — no client data
Needs approval
- Contract invoiceReady for approval
No approvals are waiting.
In progress
- Order reviewNeeds attention
- Customer requestIn progress
Completed
No completed cases to show yet.
Activity history
- Contract invoice · ready for approval
- Customer request · approved
- New cases in the dashboard
Risk estimates
- Data sources
- hours worked and the contract in the ERPinvoices and payments in the ERP
- Assumptions
- Hours continue at the current rate
- Contract scope remains unchanged
- Customer payments follow their usual pattern
- Spending follows the approved plan
Estimate · assumptions shownThis is an estimate to support a decision. It does not authorize the system to act.
Start small. Expand when the results justify it.
Each step is scoped separately. ENTER is responsible for agreed delivery and support; you remain responsible for your business rules and approvals.
-
Discuss the process, people and available data.
-
Map priorities, handoffs and possible improvements.
-
Validate data, interfaces, exceptions, permissions and expected value.
-
Build a limited solution, test it and prepare users. Review results and add capabilities where useful.
Automation Map · Illustrative example — no client data
- the process
- available data
- priorities
- handoffs
- possible improvements
- data and interfaces
- exceptions and permissions
- expected value
- testing
- reviewed results
- added capabilities
Frequently asked questions
01Do we need to replace our ERP?
02What happens if an agent makes a mistake?
03How is company data protected?
04Is this an off-the-shelf product?
05What does it cost?
Where is manual work slowing your business down?
Tell us about one process, where it gets delayed and which systems are involved. In a 30-minute call, we will discuss whether a workshop, process review or another first step makes sense.
The initial call is an introduction, not a technical audit. Any further work is scoped and agreed separately.